Quantcast
Channel: Comments on How many people are missing out on JavaScript enhancement?
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 10 View Live

By: No Javascript Day ← Terence Eden's Blog

[…] to this recent post by the UK Government's web team, approximately 1.1% of their visitors don't or can't use […]

View Article



By: A time for sharing (government content on Facebook and Twitter) | Inside...

[…] one year on Improving browse and navigation GOV.UK goes to Estonia (GDS blog) How many people are missing out on JavaScript enhancement? (GDS blog) Do we need British Sign Language on GOV.UK?...

View Article

By: Making transparency data more transparent with a CSV preview | Inside...

[…] Improving browse and navigation Government as a data model: what I learned in Estonia (GDS blog) How many people are missing out on JavaScript enhancement? (GDS blog) Do we need British Sign...

View Article

By: Paying down (technical) debt in the departments and policy publishing...

[…] Go for a new project (GDS technology blog) Building a new router for GOV.UK (GDS technology blog) How many people are missing out on JavaScript enhancement? (GDS blog) Do we need British Sign...

View Article

By: Me!

Such good news for a lame java tweaker like me 🙂

View Article


By: Vincenzo

Gosh, why has the URL of this post changed? It's been linked from all over the Internet and now they are all returning 404! 🙂

View Article

By: Carrie Barclay

In reply to Vincenzo. Sorry - we had a little glitch there! Should all be sorted now.

View Article

By: Eliot Sykes

I'm late to this story sadly...I wonder how these stats might differ if all requests were served over SSL/TLS. That would prevent services-in-the-middle like mobile networks, hotels, schools et al from...

View Article


By: robino

There is also quite some visitors who have disabled image-loading in their mobile browsers. Which would explain why the images were not loaded in the first place.

View Article


By: colin

An observation: 1 in 93 is a very misleading approximation of 1.1% because 1 in 91 is the closest approximation in the "1in X" format. (X is integer). In fact X can be any number from 87 to 95...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 10 View Live




Latest Images